Edgewood Roots Venture Catalyst
Founder
Review · prototype Illustrative data — this is a clickable pitch of the Founders Console, not live venture data. The one real decision on it: the Apex direction (A / B / C), which is laura's vision call (clint consulted on feasibility).

The console serves the ventures

Venture Portfolio

Every venture on one loop — catalyze an idea, refine it, review the real gates, launch it live. The fleet runs the work; you decide only where taste, strategy, or spend genuinely need you.

Decision rightsclint owns technical & the factory · laura owns venture vision · sparking or killing a venture needs both. Each gate is routed to whoever owns that call.

The founder loop

7 execution stages run underneath

Needs you

Genuine gates — options + analysis inside, decided here

Ventures

Open one to see its backlog & prioritized queue

Catalyze — execution stage: spark

Spark a new venture

Capture the idea while it's hot. The factory grooms it into a one-page thesis and runs a prior-art + feasibility sniff before any spend. You gate the GO.

One testable claim. This becomes the venture's success test.

Founder gate spark

Venture thesis

Prior-art: no near match Feasibility: fleet-buildable

Criteria: is the thesis testable? is now the time? · Who decides: clint (GO commits fleet spend)

No chat ping. GO writes ventures/<id> at stage spark, seeds its backlog, and drops it on the portfolio rail — the decision has a home and an artifact.

Review — the gate for Apex · execution: prototype pick

Apex bake-off — pick the direction

Three cutting-edge directions, each in the established night-sky style, each elevating a ranked opportunity from the apex scout brief. All are deployed & cross-family reviewed before you look. You decide on taste and strategy — once, here.

Options

Founder gatelaura decides · visionclint consulted · feasibility
Criteria

Which best serves the holding company's job — signalling a portfolio of ventures — while preserving the night-sky identity and the a11y floor?

Factory recommendation (non-binding)

Direction B — it answers the holding-co's purpose directly and pairs with the console's own new stage/health/backlog model. A is the safe refinement; C is the boldest brand move but carries the most craft-risk.

Direction chosen

This is the anti-chat-ping pattern. Before: these directions get pasted into a pane and decided with one word — rationale lost, no artifact. Here: the options, the factory's honest analysis, and the criteria all live on the surface, and your choice writes ventureDecisions/apex/records/… and advances apex into build.

Supporting view — the engine room

Factory Ops

Today's console lives here now — fleet, spend, board, gates. It's the machinery that runs the ventures, not the front door. Drop in when you want to see the engine; otherwise the portfolio carries the work.

Fleet snapshot

illustrative
Actors live
7
kimi · claude · grok · local
Open PRs
4
2 awaiting merge
Spend today
$18.40
within budget
Board queue
11
3 in flight
Gate ops
6
last hour
Lane board
#539
v2

Reframed, not removed. Every fleet action here is now attributed to a venture's backlog — the ops view is where you watch the machine, the portfolio is where you run the company.

Prototype — a pitch of the Founders Console as a venture catalyst platform. Night-sky tokens inherited from public/console/index.html; illustrative data throughout (live Firestore venture data not wired). Companion design doc: design/_shared/decisions/venture-catalyst-platform.md. Signed in as laura.